A majestic animal, with simple rules how easy it must be to live like one no moral choices as to whether you should kill no option for these creatures life dictates that needs out way wants or feelings. A simple , cruel by our standards maybe, life based on survival. I had chosen the polar bear for I have never seen a man tame one and walk with them. They have always fought against man. As I did not want to wait till the animal was in the mood I chose what to me is a natural warrior.
Though now, littleone I will not soon be off to slap a black nose of one. I see we have done enough to destroy it's habitat, I would not want to take one more from the life force of the north I will leave them in peace. I will soon find another animal that my battle will be futile against and let you know later of who I will offer my soul to. Perhaps a dragon should I find one hanging around.
Monday, April 30, 2007
Answers
littleone said... rather philosophical Cloud...... what's going on?? there is always something going on when You write about this theme......
Very close to the same time you and I decided to write what we needed to for ourselves not for others. I have many times repressed a blog or two for the reason that maybe the ones that stopped by might not like it. That is a reason.
Another would be a story related to me many years ago of a Japanese warrior sitting in the middle of the aftermath of a battle with comrades and enemies strewn about him , his concentration was not on his wounds but that a lotus blossom had survived the carnage. The question on that story was to stimulate thought. Is the warrior trying to escape the horror of the battle (symbolizing his life that life was always a battle but that it was not always a victory) Wondering whether war or peaceful growth was the right way and of course perhaps he just liked the flower.
Another would be a deep question of honour. One that is complicated by the fast pace life we are thrown into and the demands made upon us when we are young, too young to understand the difference between needs and wants. Decisions, demands on personal time or not having enough of it. Perhaps the increasing lack of rules or at least the lack of adherence to the rules that are.
Another would be a question as to what honour is? Is there one definition? One last one could be there are many different ways to be honourable and not just one? OOps one last one a quest for knowledge or a stimulation to gain access to others thoughts on the matter?
Multiple choice is a good thing to start dialog easier to read than an essay but if you wish to leave an essay I will not grade it unless it is poorly written or is boring and to all slaves that wish to be graded however remember I like the use of corporal punishment so just enter the office with your pants down.
Very close to the same time you and I decided to write what we needed to for ourselves not for others. I have many times repressed a blog or two for the reason that maybe the ones that stopped by might not like it. That is a reason.
Another would be a story related to me many years ago of a Japanese warrior sitting in the middle of the aftermath of a battle with comrades and enemies strewn about him , his concentration was not on his wounds but that a lotus blossom had survived the carnage. The question on that story was to stimulate thought. Is the warrior trying to escape the horror of the battle (symbolizing his life that life was always a battle but that it was not always a victory) Wondering whether war or peaceful growth was the right way and of course perhaps he just liked the flower.
Another would be a deep question of honour. One that is complicated by the fast pace life we are thrown into and the demands made upon us when we are young, too young to understand the difference between needs and wants. Decisions, demands on personal time or not having enough of it. Perhaps the increasing lack of rules or at least the lack of adherence to the rules that are.
Another would be a question as to what honour is? Is there one definition? One last one could be there are many different ways to be honourable and not just one? OOps one last one a quest for knowledge or a stimulation to gain access to others thoughts on the matter?
Multiple choice is a good thing to start dialog easier to read than an essay but if you wish to leave an essay I will not grade it unless it is poorly written or is boring and to all slaves that wish to be graded however remember I like the use of corporal punishment so just enter the office with your pants down.
Thursday, April 26, 2007
With honour but whos
Many different societies in this world have different views of what honour is, more specifically what an honourable death for a warrior is. Some such as the Japanese of old believed that ritual suicide was an honourable way to end their life through knife or sword and by ones had. There was usually a second around so that when the first cut was made the warrior did not have time o cry out in pain the second would finish the warrior by decapitation. Some very strong willed warriors would stipulate that the second wait for the second and third cuts so the warrior would show to all present what he was made of (excuse the pun) Most samurai preferred death in battle or duel.
The Norse and some Germanic tribes believed that a warrior had to die in battle for the most honourable death but as long as they died with weapon in had that was good also. A reason for the weapon in hand was to show the warrior was still fighting or at least still free to carry a weapon . As the case was to take weapons away from defeated warriors so they could not fight again.
The rules of honour seem to change by race what would be honourable to a warrior depends on how they have lived their lives. In Buddhism they are taught you must be a warrior at all times one of the teaching is the way of the warrior but not the death it is not touched upon.
SO is it better to face a dragon for final battle or have you name in song about the foes you conquered and killed. Is honour more in what you did not destroy, the times you did not have to raise weapons, should a warrior say his death was a good one by the battles he did not have to fight. Should a Warrior be remember for the skill of his sword or how he saved a butterfly.
The Norse and some Germanic tribes believed that a warrior had to die in battle for the most honourable death but as long as they died with weapon in had that was good also. A reason for the weapon in hand was to show the warrior was still fighting or at least still free to carry a weapon . As the case was to take weapons away from defeated warriors so they could not fight again.
The rules of honour seem to change by race what would be honourable to a warrior depends on how they have lived their lives. In Buddhism they are taught you must be a warrior at all times one of the teaching is the way of the warrior but not the death it is not touched upon.
SO is it better to face a dragon for final battle or have you name in song about the foes you conquered and killed. Is honour more in what you did not destroy, the times you did not have to raise weapons, should a warrior say his death was a good one by the battles he did not have to fight. Should a Warrior be remember for the skill of his sword or how he saved a butterfly.
Sunday, April 22, 2007
The saddest thing
A young man has contacted me. he wishes to give over control to me of his life, he has in the past tried to do so without success. he sounds as if he would be a wonderful little dog resting in his cage quietly till called upon to perform. his needs or should I say his wants are along a fantasy line and I fear he knows not what he is asking for. I have offered to guide him but I do not have all the time he thinks he needs.
Sadly that in the lifestyle these poor males through everything at you offering time their money, total servitude yet if this had been a girl would I have treated her differently. I do like torturing men it is fun you have and immediate response when some thing is arousing o them as well as when it scares them. They are embarrassed so easily they so wish to be good yet fail so easily. females tend at least this is my opinion glide through most tasks , they are sough after for their bodies their beauty it would have been more interesting to get the same offer from a female than that little boy .
SO I have decided to take some control over him make him feel what it is to loose control of his life and we will see. What is the saddest thing any sub that wishes to give control away and cannot find some one to take it from them.
Sadly that in the lifestyle these poor males through everything at you offering time their money, total servitude yet if this had been a girl would I have treated her differently. I do like torturing men it is fun you have and immediate response when some thing is arousing o them as well as when it scares them. They are embarrassed so easily they so wish to be good yet fail so easily. females tend at least this is my opinion glide through most tasks , they are sough after for their bodies their beauty it would have been more interesting to get the same offer from a female than that little boy .
SO I have decided to take some control over him make him feel what it is to loose control of his life and we will see. What is the saddest thing any sub that wishes to give control away and cannot find some one to take it from them.
Saturday, April 21, 2007
Simple etiquette
Do not talk with food in your mouth. I wiash to look at you not the hamburger being crushed between your teeth. You would think humans would have a a certain standard but we do not . Blowing your nose at the dining table without an excuse me. A rant no just things that I have noticed in the young submissive. They seem to want o impress a Dom with their bodies.
submission does not come from the body , it is in the mind, the id you could say some say from the heart . It is not from the body. It is honestly opening your self up to trusting another the deepest form of trust that one can give. Simply how fast your hand recoils when in contact with a pin prick and why and you can see how much trust you need. A submissive must control that reflex and the fight or flight reflex. For that you need strength as a person to overcome the minds response to pain. Yes my slaves must be intelligent and possess inner personal strength. So it would go to figure that you must show some evidence of self control in how you present yourself.
The one way I see this is through etiquette for me. Does not have to be the Queens but it has to come through that you have some thought on the idea of it.
submission does not come from the body , it is in the mind, the id you could say some say from the heart . It is not from the body. It is honestly opening your self up to trusting another the deepest form of trust that one can give. Simply how fast your hand recoils when in contact with a pin prick and why and you can see how much trust you need. A submissive must control that reflex and the fight or flight reflex. For that you need strength as a person to overcome the minds response to pain. Yes my slaves must be intelligent and possess inner personal strength. So it would go to figure that you must show some evidence of self control in how you present yourself.
The one way I see this is through etiquette for me. Does not have to be the Queens but it has to come through that you have some thought on the idea of it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
